Decks and Deals Weekly #56
During 31 October–6 November 2026, shipping markets paired profits from delays with softer freight, expensive ship purchases and a proposed European storage acquisition
During 31 October–6 November 2026, shipping markets paired profits from delays with softer freight, expensive ship purchases and a proposed European storage acquisition
During 24–30 October 2026, shipping markets exposed the cost of securing vessels, from Gulf tanker operations to firm resale prices and long-term charter commitments
During 17–23 October 2026, shipping markets tested diesel margins and Russian fuel diplomacy, while carriers raised container rates and sanctions reached the firms behind the fleet
The acquisition of Euroports brings A.P. Moller Capital into Kavala, raising the prospect of Maersk redistributing container calls from Thessaloniki and potentially reshaping competition for cargo flows across the Balkan hinterland
During 10–16 October 2026, shipping markets weighed possible sanctions relief as tanker risks persisted, Capesize earnings fell and container carriers tested their ability to charge more
During 3–9 October 2026, shipping markets priced scarce tanker capacity, discounted container space and exposed the distance between an impressive freight assessment and a bankable return
During 26 September–2 October 2026, shipping markets rewarded control of vessels, contracts and access. Cargo recovery brought fresh opportunities, but the gains depended on who could actually deliver
Chinese ports have never been busier. The reason has less to do with appetite in Ohio than with a tariff clock in Washington, which the two capitals have now rewound to 10 January 2027
During 19–25 September 2026, shipping markets weighed Trump–Xi trade pledges against tanker bottlenecks and rising war-risk costs. Diplomatic relief mattered; dependable passage still carried a formidable price
In the week ending 18 September, maritime trade revealed its real constraint: access on workable terms. Freight rates, sanctions and investment structures showed who can charge for it