Skip to content

A closure of the Strait of Hormuz would unleash an en-ergy shock, spike inflation, paralyze shipping routes, and fuel global tensions—pushing markets, governments, and central banks into a new era of volatility

Editorial | by
George Skordilis
George Skordilis
Satellite image at night showing the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz with illuminated coastal cities
NASA
Nighttime satellite view of the Persian Gulf, highlight-ing the Strait of Hormuz—a global energy chokepoint
Home » What a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would mean for the world

What a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would mean for the world

A potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz—one of the most critical chokepoints in global trade and energy transit—would send immediate shockwaves across the world economy. The impact would include a dramatic surge in oil and gas prices, intensifying geopolitical tensions, and triggering a cascading disruption across shipping, insurance, energy markets, and consumer prices.

Located between Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, the Strait is a narrow maritime corridor through which thousands of tankers pass each year, carrying:

  • Approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply
  • Roughly 30% of global LNG (liquefied natural gas) exports

This narrow waterway is the Achilles’ heel of global energy flows. Should it be blocked, the global economy would enter a new and precarious energy regime.

Energy markets would respond instantly. Oil prices could surpass $150 per barrel for Brent, driven not only by supply constraints but also by market psychology and elevated war-risk premiums. The flow of Qatari LNG—the world’s largest exporter—would be drastically reduced. European nations, already heavily reliant on LNG imports following the war in Ukraine, would face a severe energy crunch.

Soaring energy costs would ignite a fresh inflationary wave. For countries like India, Japan, China, and members of the European Union, the impact would be twofold: surging import bills and rising social pressure due to increased living costs.

Central banks would be pushed into a difficult policy dilemma: raise interest rates to contain inflation or cut them to support growth. The risk of a global recession would resurface forcefully.

From a shipping perspective, Hormuz is a strategic maritime hub. A shutdown would effectively block oil and gas flows from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iraq, Kuwait, and Qatar.

Such a development would likely cause:

  • A surge in tanker freight rates
  • A sharp increase in war-risk insurance premiums
  • A scramble for limited alternative routes
  • A breakdown of maritime supply chains

Within days, the world could face a global logistics crisis.

If Iran were to enforce a closure—either directly or through proxy actors—the possibility of military escalation would become almost unavoidable. The United States, the United Kingdom, and allied naval forces in the Gulf would likely move swiftly to restore maritime security.

The risk of broader conflict—including engagements with Iranian proxies such as the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and PMUs in Iraq—would grow considerably. What begins as a regional disruption could easily escalate into a wider confrontation involving the Persian Gulf, Eastern Mediterranean, and North Africa.

Key stakeholders at the center of the storm:

  • Tanker owners: Potential profits could be offset by extreme risk exposure
  • Insurance providers: Will need to rapidly reassess terms, exclusions, and premiums
  • Governments: Will be pressured to safeguard national supply chains and energy security
  • Commodities investors: Will operate in an environment of extreme volatility

The Strait of Hormuz is not just a regional flashpoint—it is the most fragile artery of the global economy. Any disruption there would not merely reflect another Middle Eastern crisis, but rather a worldwide economic and geopolitical shock with far-reaching, unpredictable consequences.