Skip to content

China and the EU restart talks on EV subsidies, nudged by Trump’s tariffs into an uneasy compromise. How long can this fragile truce last?

Leapmotor factory workers in Jinhua assembling an electric vehicle on the production line
Workers at Leapmotor’s intelligent factory in Jinhua assemble a new energy vehicle, showcasing China’s expanding EV production
Home » EV trade tango: From rivals to reluctant dance partners

EV trade tango: From rivals to reluctant dance partners

In a move that underscores how quickly geopolitical winds can shift, China and the European Union have agreed to restart negotiations over the EU’s anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). The announcement, made by China’s Commerce Ministry (MOFCOM) on Thursday, signals a tentative de-escalation after months of mutual suspicion. But the timing is no accident. With Donald Trump back in office and already imposing steep tariffs—34% on Chinese goods, 20% on EU exports, and 25% on all imported automobiles—both sides appear to be urgently recalibrating their positions.

The détente follows a March 28 meeting between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and European Trade and Economic Security Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič. According to MOFCOM spokesperson He Yadong, the talks were “frank, in-depth, and pragmatic”—diplomatic code for a conversation that was likely as tense as it was necessary. The two sides emerged with a fragile consensus: to stabilize economic relations, enhance dialogue, and, crucially, restart price commitment talks in the EU’s anti-subsidy case.

The irony of forced cooperation

Just months ago, the EU was positioning itself as a bulwark against China’s industrial overcapacity, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warning of a flood of subsidized Chinese EVs “distorting” the market. Now, faced with the prospect of a Trumpian trade war that could leave Europe squeezed between Washington and Beijing, Brussels seems to be softening its stance. The irony is thick enough to cut with a knife. The same EU that once eyed China’s trade practices with hawkish suspicion is now scrambling to avoid becoming collateral damage in a broader U.S.-China conflict.

The EV trade war has been a flashpoint since the EU launched its anti-subsidy probe last October. China, in turn, retaliated with an anti-dumping investigation into EU brandy—a not-so-subtle jab at France, the primary advocate for the EV probe. Yet, in a telling concession, Beijing has now agreed to extend the brandy investigation timeline, a gesture that reeks of tactical pragmatism.

Trump’s tariffs: The unspoken catalyst

No one in Brussels or Beijing will admit it outright, but Trump’s resurgence is the elephant in the room. His pledge to impose sweeping tariffs on Chinese imports—and his broader disdain for multilateral trade frameworks—has forced a recalibration. For Europe, the calculus is simple: if the U.S. is about to slam the door on Chinese goods, the last thing the EU needs is to be left holding the bag, with neither market access nor leverage.

China, meanwhile, sees an opportunity to exploit transatlantic fissures. By offering concessions on EVs—a sector where Europe fears Chinese dominance—Beijing is betting that economic pragmatism will outweigh ideological resistance. The EV trade war may cool, but the underlying tensions won’t vanish.

The broader landscape

Beyond EVs, the talks touched on cosmetics regulations, agricultural market access, and EU foreign subsidy investigations—all areas where Europe has sought to assert its regulatory power. Yet the outcomes were conspicuously vague. Both sides pledged to “ensure a fair competitive environment,” a phrase so broad it could mean anything from genuine reform to bureaucratic lip service.

What’s clear is that neither side wants a full-blown trade war. But whether this truce holds depends on factors beyond their control. With Trump back in the Oval Office and global trade alliances in flux, Europe may find itself pushed further into China’s orbit—a scenario that would have seemed unthinkable just a year ago.

If one thing is clear about this fragile truce, it’s that it isn’t built on mutual trust but on cold, strategic calculation. Brussels and Beijing haven’t suddenly become allies—they’re simply trying to avoid a trade storm they can’t fully control.

But the real question remains: how long can this balance hold in a world where geopolitical tides shift so rapidly? With Trump looming and markets adjusting, today’s ceasefire might just be the calm before the next storm.